<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, It&#8217;s NOT Racial Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html</link>
	<description>... for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 22:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Petersen</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-371</guid>
		<description>:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ockraz</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>ockraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-370</guid>
		<description>&quot;Inexperience&quot; is code for &quot;not having much experience.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Inexperience&#8221; is code for &#8220;not having much experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Man.  I always hated math.  Now I know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man.  I always hated math.  Now I know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Petersen</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-86</guid>
		<description>carol... I hate to break it to you, but if you&#039;re 50+, you&#039;re in your SIXTH decade. I&#039;ve done the math because I&#039;m there, too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>carol&#8230; I hate to break it to you, but if you&#8217;re 50+, you&#8217;re in your SIXTH decade. I&#8217;ve done the math because I&#8217;m there, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Oops.  I hate getting on my high horse about the wrong issue -- and it seems to be happening more frequently as I move through my fifth decade.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You&#039;re right -- the &quot;he&#039;s inexperienced&quot; charge is not racial dog-whistling.  And as you have seen, I have a keen ear for dog-whistling.  Sorry &#039;bout that.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, as we move towards a probable Obama victory (I&#039;ll eat crow on Wed if need be), I think everyone better get ready for much discussion of dog-whistles.  As a 50+, white, southern, history and political science buff, I offer my opinion that America has yet to get past its original sin:  racism.  We have come a long way, no lie.  But we aren&#039;t there yet.  Fasten your seat belt, cause the next four years could be a bumpy (albeit interesting) ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  I hate getting on my high horse about the wrong issue &#8212; and it seems to be happening more frequently as I move through my fifth decade.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8212; the &#8220;he&#8217;s inexperienced&#8221; charge is not racial dog-whistling.  And as you have seen, I have a keen ear for dog-whistling.  Sorry &#8217;bout that.  </p>
<p>However, as we move towards a probable Obama victory (I&#8217;ll eat crow on Wed if need be), I think everyone better get ready for much discussion of dog-whistles.  As a 50+, white, southern, history and political science buff, I offer my opinion that America has yet to get past its original sin:  racism.  We have come a long way, no lie.  But we aren&#8217;t there yet.  Fasten your seat belt, cause the next four years could be a bumpy (albeit interesting) ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Petersen</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-84</guid>
		<description>No groans here, Carol, I&#039;m happy to have you as a correspondent.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I see your point on welfare, but Dickerson wasn&#039;t making a socialism point, he was saying that it&#039;s racial code to criticize Obama as &quot;inexperienced.&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And as you point out, partly nationalizing the banks is a quintessentially socialist step.  But there&#039;s widespread agreement across the political spectrum that it was necessary, and I certainly believe it was.  If the credit markets had remained frozen, it was only a matter of time before (for example) paychecks would start to bounce even at blue-chip companies.  The ensuing panic would have crippled the American economy and, for that matter, the world economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No groans here, Carol, I&#8217;m happy to have you as a correspondent.</p>
<p>I see your point on welfare, but Dickerson wasn&#8217;t making a socialism point, he was saying that it&#8217;s racial code to criticize Obama as &#8220;inexperienced.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And as you point out, partly nationalizing the banks is a quintessentially socialist step.  But there&#8217;s widespread agreement across the political spectrum that it was necessary, and I certainly believe it was.  If the credit markets had remained frozen, it was only a matter of time before (for example) paychecks would start to bounce even at blue-chip companies.  The ensuing panic would have crippled the American economy and, for that matter, the world economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kirkpetersen.net/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey, Kirk -- I&#039;m back (he groans).  I agree with you and with Dickerson each 50/50.  It is absolutely fair criticism (and not dog-whistling racial code) to call us liberals &quot;socialists.&quot;  First, it refers to our political beliefs, which is where political discourse should be centered, IMHO.  Second, from the world-view of many (not all) conservatives, my views ARE socialist.  I&#039;m not a stalinist, I&#039;m not a communist.   I do believe in progressive income taxes, social safety nets, etc., which could be described as socialism.  Point, Kirk.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dickerson has a point buried in his comment as well, though.  I haven&#039;t listened to the podcast, but it sounds like it was very badly articulated.  Here&#039;s the point as I have observed it in republican talking points:  The knock on Obama is not that giving tax dollars to large banks, partially nationalizing those institutions, is socialist (oh, yeah, that&#039;s what the current Republican administration is doing).  Its not an attack on the progressive income tax (oh, yeah, that won&#039;t play really well when it seems to insulate many of the folks who got us into this economic mess).  The socialist rap on Obama is &quot;he will bring back welfare.&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Welfare,&quot; in this country, is seen as a program that takes money from hard-working white people and gives it to (invariably black) welfare queens who have more babies so they can make payments on brightly colored cadillacs.  Although the majority of welfare recipients have ALWAYS been white, that&#039;s not what most conservative white people believe.  That&#039;s the racist dog whistle Dickerson (apparently inarticulately) was referring to.  Point John.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If Obama is president, his opponents must, absolutely, be able to criticize him without being accused of racism.  However, where racist stereotypes underly such criticism, the opposition must expect the argument to include those underying sterotypes.  I do NOT accuse you of racism.  I DO accuse the RNC, playing on welfare as the basis for charges of socialism, to also be playing on racial stereotypes among many conservative voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Kirk &#8212; I&#8217;m back (he groans).  I agree with you and with Dickerson each 50/50.  It is absolutely fair criticism (and not dog-whistling racial code) to call us liberals &#8220;socialists.&#8221;  First, it refers to our political beliefs, which is where political discourse should be centered, IMHO.  Second, from the world-view of many (not all) conservatives, my views ARE socialist.  I&#8217;m not a stalinist, I&#8217;m not a communist.   I do believe in progressive income taxes, social safety nets, etc., which could be described as socialism.  Point, Kirk.</p>
<p>Dickerson has a point buried in his comment as well, though.  I haven&#8217;t listened to the podcast, but it sounds like it was very badly articulated.  Here&#8217;s the point as I have observed it in republican talking points:  The knock on Obama is not that giving tax dollars to large banks, partially nationalizing those institutions, is socialist (oh, yeah, that&#8217;s what the current Republican administration is doing).  Its not an attack on the progressive income tax (oh, yeah, that won&#8217;t play really well when it seems to insulate many of the folks who got us into this economic mess).  The socialist rap on Obama is &#8220;he will bring back welfare.&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;Welfare,&#8221; in this country, is seen as a program that takes money from hard-working white people and gives it to (invariably black) welfare queens who have more babies so they can make payments on brightly colored cadillacs.  Although the majority of welfare recipients have ALWAYS been white, that&#8217;s not what most conservative white people believe.  That&#8217;s the racist dog whistle Dickerson (apparently inarticulately) was referring to.  Point John.</p>
<p>If Obama is president, his opponents must, absolutely, be able to criticize him without being accused of racism.  However, where racist stereotypes underly such criticism, the opposition must expect the argument to include those underying sterotypes.  I do NOT accuse you of racism.  I DO accuse the RNC, playing on welfare as the basis for charges of socialism, to also be playing on racial stereotypes among many conservative voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
