Is McCain’s call to suspend the campaign over the financial crisis an example of leadership? Is it a political ploy?
Neo-neocon (I like her blog, but I LOVE her blog’s name) sums it up pretty well:
Just because there is some political posturing does not mean thereâ€™s not also some sincerity. Each candidate is revealing something about himself even as he jockeys for position, and they are running true to type.
McCain is an action man who doesnâ€™t like to dither. Heâ€™s been in the Senate for a long time and has done a great deal of hammering out of deals, and he is comfortable in that arena. …
Obama is not a decision-maker, nor does he really feel comfortable in the Senate, having spent very little time there. He likes to sit back and study all the angles, and even then would prefer to let things emerge rather than taking a leadership role.
Update: Now McCain has said he’ll participate in the debate (about 150 minutes from now as I write this at 6:30), and this is being reported as a cave-in and an embarrassment for McCain. Maybe. But blogger Nate Silver made the point a day ago (hat tip: Taranto) that McCain’s gambit has served to focus attention on a debate that nobody was talking about much.
If McCain does much better than Obama tonight, that will swamp the effect of the flip-flop on suspending the campaign. And while Obama is dramatically better with a teleprompter than McCain, there will be no teleprompter tonight. In a give-and-take discussion, my money’s on McCain.