I may have been too quick to sneer yesterday at President Obama’s appearance in Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize.
The prize itself is still ridiculous, of course.Â (And don’t get me started on the statue.)Â But in addition to the obvious point that the honor is unearned, the president has faced critics from his left who believe the recent escalation of Mr. Obama’s War is inconsistent with the prize.
Seeking to answer those critics, Obama used his acceptance speech to issue a ringing declaration of American exceptionalism (although he would not use that term).
In the last 24 hours, I’ve watched one conservative after another find things to praise in the speech.Â Neo-neocon (not an Obama fan) called it “the most robust defense of American military action Iâ€™ve ever heard him give,” and quoted this passage (my emphasis):
But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitlerâ€™s armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaedaâ€™s leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism â€” it is a recognition of history; the imperfections of man and the limits of reasonâ€¦
But the world must remember that it was not simply international institutions â€” not just treaties and declarations â€” that brought stability to a post-World War II world. Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: The United States of America has helped underwrite global security for more than six decades with the blood of our citizens and the strength of our arms.
In a post in The Corner titled “Obama the Neocon,” Michael Ledeen said:
It’s “only a speech,” to be sure.Â And there things I wish he hadn’t said, or said differently.Â But it’s a very different sort of speech, and it contained many words that are downright neoconnish:
America will always be a voice for those aspirations that are universal. We will bear witness to the quiet dignity of reformers like Aung Sang Suu Kyi; to the bravery of Zimbabweans who cast their ballots in the face of beatings; to the hundreds of thousands who have marched silently through the streets of Iran. It is telling that the leaders of these governments fear the aspirations of their own people more than the power of any other nation. And it is the responsibility of all free people and free nations to make clear that these movements â€” these movements of hope and history â€” they have us on their side.
It sure sounds like President Obama just endorsed the Green Movement in Iran.
In a roundup titled “Conservative Praise for Obama Speech,” Politico notes the endorsement of former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich:
Itâ€™s already being called the â€œObama Doctrineâ€ â€“ a notion that foreign policy is a struggle of good and evil, that American exceptionalism has blunted the force of tyranny in the world, and that U.S. military can be a force for good and even harnessed to humanitarian ends.
â€œI think having a liberal president who goes to Oslo on behalf of a peace prize and reminds the committee that they would not be free, they wouldn’t be able to have a peace prize, without having [the ability to use] force,â€ Gingrich said. â€œI thought in some ways it’s a very historic speech.â€
The conservative other conservatives love to hate, Kathleen Parker, wrote in the Washington Post:
The speech was a signal moment in the evolution and maturation of Obama from ambivalent aspirant to reluctant leader.
Rising to the occasion, he managed to redeem himself at a low point in his popularity by reminding Americans of what is best about themselves.
At Contentions, Jennifer Rubin (really not an Obama fan):
But this speech is perhaps the closest he has come to throwing the American antiwar Left under the bus. America will defend itself. There is evil in the world. And yes, we are at war with religious fanatics:
Most dangerously, we see it in the way that religion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam, and who attacked my country from Afghanistan. These extremists are not the first to kill in the name of God; the cruelties of the Crusades are amply recorded. But they remind us that no Holy War can ever be a just war.
For if you truly believe that you are carrying out divine will, then there is no need for restraint â€“ no need to spare the pregnant mother, or the medic, or even a person of oneâ€™s own faith. Such a warped view of religion is not just incompatible with the concept of peace, but the purpose of faith â€“ for the one rule that lies at the heart of every major religion is that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.
It is not at all what the netroot crowd that lifted him to the presidency had in mind. It seems that reality may be dawning, however dimly, on the White House.
I could go on and on. (I guess I already have.)Â I expect in the future I will continue to have more criticism than praise for Mr. Obama. But while I am always proud to be an American, today I am proud of my President.
This is stunning. I may have to quit referring to President Obama as Jimmy Carter II if this keeps up. Could it be that Barack is really related to Ronald Reagan? He seems to have learned something from the Reagan Doctrine and I, for one, am glad.
Hear hear, Matt. His domestic agenda qualifies him as a classic tax-and-spend Democrat, but in many ways his foreign policy has looked a lot like Bush's Third Term.
I for one thought that he looked like someone talking about something he new nothing about, which could explain your reaction. It was like hearing about how to rebuild your engine from a beautician. She might know what she's talking about, but you won't realize it until after you get over the fact that she's talking over her clippers.
Pingback: Jennifer Rubin Decamps from De Contentions | All That Is Necessary…