Obama’s Health Care “Victory” Plants the Seeds for His 2012 Defeat

John C. Goodman

I can’t find it now, but before the election I recall reading a smug liberal comment that it was mathematically impossible for the Democrats to lose enough Senate seats to give the Republicans a veto-proof majority of 60 seats.  Thus, the commenter said, Obamacare would be unrepealable even after the 2010 election.

Until the 2012 election, of course.

In an article titled “What Can Republicans Do About Obamacare?“, John C. Goodman describes why Obamacare opponents can afford to wait for a Republican president.  Here’s how it starts:

Everyone expects the new Republican House of Representatives will vote to repeal Obamacare. This move will probably be blocked in the Democrat-controlled Senate, however; and failing that, the president will use his veto pen to save the Democrats’ crown-jewel policy achievement.

Then what? Having health care as an issue may actually be a blessing for the GOP. Obamacare has been a gift to the Republican party. It was the single most important reason for their historic gains in last week’s election. Better still, it’s a gift that can keep on giving, if appropriately managed.

Remember, the really bad features of the law (mandates for individuals, fines for employers, federal regulation of everyone’s insurance, government-run health-insurance exchanges) don’t kick in for several more years (in 2014). In the meantime, Republicans don’t really lose very much if the best argument for voting Republican in the 2012 election remains in place.

On the other side of the aisle, the health-care-reform bill is an albatross hanging around Democrats’ necks. I doubt if any Democrat wants to cast an up-or-down vote on it again. And as long as it’s there (especially if it’s never really implemented), it will cost the Democrats many congressional seats. Imagine that the start date keeps getting pushed back. Along the way, Obamacare will be a big issue in every election. That scenario would be a nightmare for the Democratic party.

Note to Republicans:  PLEASE don’t throw away the chance by nominating Sarah Palin in 2012.

.

2 thoughts on “Obama’s Health Care “Victory” Plants the Seeds for His 2012 Defeat

  1. Haha, yeah, people are really going to hate it. Like the 80% who wanted MORE healthcare and the 60% a public option and didn’t get it.

    Especially as the favorable features kick in. Healthcare that can be extended to 24-26 yo? They’ll really lose the youth over that one. I don’t understand any logical argument against healthcare. Or anything positive that will be done by the party of no if control in 2014 is their sole objective rather than governance over the intervening two years..

  2. Dan, I don’t know where you’re getting your data, but here’s a link to the latest RealClearPolitics.com average of healthcare polls, showing opponents of Obamacare trailing defenders by 51.5% to 39.9%: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/obama_and_democrats_health_care_plan-1130.html

    We just came through an election where the only candidates talking about healthcare were Republicans. They picked up more seats than either party has gained in any election since 1938. Keep on talking about the coming groundswell of support for Obamacare, and I’ll see you in 2012.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *