It’s Census time, and there’s a nefarious conservative plot afoot to undermine the gummint by subverting the racial purity of the decennial enumeration. The idea is to answer the racial question by ignoring the familiar black/white/Asian categories, selecting “Other,” and writing in “American.”
How do I know it’s a conservative plot?Â Well, it’s been discussed at length in The Corner.Â Taranto posted on his Facebook page that he “was American before it was cool,” and backed it up with a link to his article at the time of the 2000 census, where he advocated essentially the same thing.Â Â There’s even a menacing quote from uber-conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia: “In the eyes of government, we are just one race here. It is American.”
So it must be a conservative plot — except the Web Goddess doesn’t see it that way.Â When I first mentioned the idea to her, she said it appeals to her from a liberal perspective.Â The twist she suggests is to move back one step further and answer the race question with “Other – human.” There’s a logic to that, but it passes up an opportunity to make a patriotic statement.Â If some future World Government takes a census, I’ll answer “human” on that one.
Another idea is for anyone who was born and raised in this country to answer “Native American” — but the Census folks seem to have anticipated this.Â If you look at the form reproduced above, the category is labeled “American Indian or Alaska Native” — there is no Native American box to check.
One thing that’s clear is that you shouldn’t lie, as “native American” Hans A. von Spakovsky writes:
Congress has directed through a federal law that anyone who â€œrefuses or willfully neglectsâ€¦to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questionsâ€ on the Census form can be fined $100 (13 U.S.C. Â§ 221).Â If you deliberately give a false answer, you can be fined up to $500.Â Although there are not a lot of reported prosecutions, this statutory requirement has been upheld by the courts as constitutional.
So the standard I have to meet is answering “to the best of [my] knowledge.”Â OK, here are some samples of my knowledge:
- I know that data on race helps fuel the racial grievance industry. (I do not know of any counterbalancing, non-pernicious use for racial data.)
- I know that any moral justification there may once have been for Affirmative Action (and other forms of race-based discrimination) has disappeared with the election of a black president.Â Equality of opportunity should be the standard, not equality of outcome.
- I know the approach the Census takes to racial identity is utterly ridiculous and inconsistent.Â Start with the question itself, as reproduced above.Â Note that one of the choices offered under “Other Asian” is “Pakistani.” In the words of Mark Krikorian, who touched off the debate in The Corner:
If “Pakistani” â€” a political/religious identity invented in 1934 â€” is a “race,” then “American” is a race.
(“Invented” is the correct term, btw. There is no ethnic Paki tribe – the word started out as an acronym. But I digress.)
- I know more than 20 million people chose “American” as their race in the 2000 Census — making it the third-ranking choice, after “German” and “African American.”Â Here’s the data from the U.S. Census’s “Ancestry” page.Â (Yes, I know that race, ethnicity and ancestry all mean different things, but the Census seems to use the terms interchangeably.)Â And here’s a more user-friendly version of the Census spreadsheet — I’ve eliminated empty-category noise and sorted by top answers. It turns out that “English” outpolls “Mexican,” although if you lump in “Mexicano” and “Mexican-American,” the Mexicans surge ahead. “Human” doesn’t show up, it must be lumped in with “Not Reported.”
So it turns out that to the best of my knowledge, I’m an American.Â Who’s with me?
Even their own form is wrong. They ask for race, but most of the choices they offer are nationalities (though most of my Japanese friends would disagree with me). And while our (Sis and me) can trace our roots back to Scotland, we're 15th generation Americans. I'm sure some mixing has had to have occcured over the centuries. What f I had kids? Would they be Asian? "White"? Scottish?
No, they would be American. Like you, me, Sis, the president, and 300,000,000+ of our neighbors.
As for the threat of being fined, let them try. Any law that requires you to tell the census bureau anything beyond the number of people in the house is unconstitutional. I am HOPING to see a "Heller moment" in front of the U.S. Supreme Court over the census.
Some people have said that the US immigration office is going to trace census respondents, find out if they are in this country legally, then locate and deport them if they are not. It's part of a crackdown on undocumented workers — SO wrong!